微信公众号 
图码生活

每天发布有五花八门的文章,各种有趣的知识等,期待您的订阅与参与
搜索结果最多仅显示 10 条随机数据
结果缓存两分钟
如需更多更快搜索结果请访问小程序
美国纽约大都会艺术博物馆展品查阅
美国纽约大都会艺术博物馆展品查阅
美国大都会艺术博物馆中的24万件展品,图片展示以及中文和英文双语介绍(中文翻译仅供参考)
读取中
读取中
读取中
品名(中)Triton和Nereid
品名(英)Triton and Nereid
入馆年号1949年,49.7.59a, b
策展部门欧洲雕塑和装饰艺术European Sculpture and Decorative Arts
创作者Andrea Briosco, called Riccio【1470 至 1532】【意大利人】
创作年份公元 1532 - 公元 1555
创作地区
分类雕塑青铜(Sculpture-Bronze)
尺寸整体 (confirmed): 8 5/8 × 4 3/8 × 6 1/8 英寸 (21.9 × 11.1 × 15.6 厘米)
介绍(中)一个比例精致的女人骑在一个肌肉发达的男性生物的背上,这个生物从腰部以上都是人类,有卷轴状的前腿和绿叶鳍的蛇形身体。这对是希腊罗马的海神。雌性是Nereid或海洋若虫。男性形象,通常被认定为海卫一,更准确地说是海半人马(鱼半人马),一种神话中的混合体,拥有男人的上半身、马的前腿和蛇的下半身。[1]海卫一和涅瑞德的形象经常出现在古典浮雕上,在古代宝石上表现为一对孤独的夫妇,[2]在大理石石棺上表现为喧闹的人群进行海战或伴随的凯旋海上游行(海洋thiasoi)。[3]然而,海卫一和涅瑞德对并不是古典小雕像的孤立主题。这组青铜器是文艺复兴时期的发明,模仿古董,同时自由地离开它。

创作受古典和当代浮雕启发的独立小雕像让人想起帕多瓦青铜大师安德里亚·里奇奥的构图方法。4] 海卫一和涅瑞德组与里奇奥的其他青铜雕像之间的形式相似性使学者们将这个模型的概念归功于大师。然而,Triton和Nereid幸存的铸件中没有一个表现出非常独特的金属锤击,这是Riccio青铜器的标志,只有Bargello的例子暂时与Riccio的商店有关。[5] 大都会海卫一和涅瑞德的建模比巴杰罗对应物要简单得多;它缺乏海卫一腿上的装饰性刺痛,以及人物特征和头发上的精致工具。一位不知名的,大概是帕多安雕塑家,他可能接触到了Riccio的模型,可能在大师去世后塑造了我们的青铜器。[6]

已知有十二个版本的海卫一和涅瑞德小雕像。7]幸存的青铜器数量表明,该主题引起了威尼托观众的共鸣,那里的海洋thiasoi象征着威尼斯与海洋的关系。[8]凯旋海上游行装饰着1507年在圣马可广场竖立的巨大青铜旗杆底座。[9] 宇宙学的海浮雕是帕多瓦圣安东尼大教堂里乔高耸的青铜逾越节烛台脚下的基础场景(第 00 页,图 13c)。[10]这种公共图像的核心公民重要性可能鼓励了海卫一和涅瑞德小雕像在私人家庭领域的发展。海卫一和

海卫一独特的人物类型、姿势和手势最终源于文艺复兴时期众所周知的罗马一个零碎的海上胜利石棺。[11]在它上面,就像在大多数经典石棺上一样,Nereid乘客被描绘成镜像,一个从前面显示,另一个从后面显示。这两种观点都结合在这个引人入胜的小雕像中,无论是放在架子上的高处还是桌子上的低处(展示青铜器最常见的国内位置),从两侧都同样出色地组成。海卫一的戏剧性手势和头部的转弯 - 大概是朝向观众 - 表明小雕像的设计主要从男性一侧观看,提供了Nereid优雅的背部的适度视野。当放在桌子的低处时,从正面看的Nereid和她更大的男性同伴之间的互补游戏被揭示出来。她经典理想化的性感与海卫一可怕的混合肌肉形成鲜明对比。她优雅、平衡的姿势和平静内省的表情缓和了海卫一好战的姿态和好战的外向凝视。

海卫一猛地抬头看向左边,张开嘴,露出牙齿。他原本举起的右手拿着一个物体;手指和拇指在相当大的插入孔周围卷曲。海卫一的手势与挥舞武器一致,例如,在曼特尼亚著名的十五世纪后期海神之战版画中可以看到。[12]在他放下的左手里,海卫一拿着一个空洞(排笛),这是潘神的属性,也是酒神和狂喜之神巴克斯的追随者所共有的。在文艺复兴时期,海上胜利和巴基克游行象征着身体、心理和精神的转变,因此经常一起出现。[13]在《海卫一》和《涅瑞德》中,这些主题之间的关系得到了最大程度的提炼,赋予了小青铜器根据观众的需要和情绪以各种方式解释的能力。例如,在学者的书房或收藏家的橱柜中,生动的青铜雕像可能被认为体现了创造性思维所必需的灵感巴基克能量。另一方面,对海卫一和涅瑞德旅程的沉思可能会唤起石棺上的经典海上游行,象征着精神进入永恒。
-DA

脚注
(有关缩短参考文献的关键,请参阅大都会艺术博物馆艾伦,意大利文艺复兴和巴洛克青铜器的参考书目。纽约:大都会艺术博物馆,2022)

1。迪米特里奥斯·齐科斯和丹尼斯·艾伦在艾伦2008a,第104页,猫。2,其中还指出,海卫一的抽象卷轴状前腿可能受到手稿插图中怪诞装饰的启发。有关文艺复兴时期杂交生物与怪诞装饰之间的关系,请参阅Hammeken和Hansen 2019。
2. 例如,综合格斗,06.1205。
3. 对于文艺复兴时期已知的海洋硫亚索石棺,请参阅 Bober 和 Rubinstein 2010,第 142-47 页。
4. 见艾伦 2008b,第 23–24 页。
5. 巴杰罗,353 B; 见艾伦2008a,第108-9页。
6.合金是黄铜,含有一些铅,锡,砷,银,锑,铁和镍。 R. 斯通/TR, 2012.
7. 见Jestaz 2005年,第153页,第122页。
8. 有关威尼托大区海卫一和涅瑞德图案的重要性,请参阅 Luchs 2010。
9. 见威科 1996。
10. 见班扎托 2008b.
11.有关此石棺及其在威尼托文艺复兴时期艺术中的众多反映,请参阅Bober和Rubinstein 2010,第144-45页,第100期,图100i-ii,
100a-b.12。综合格斗,18.12 和 1984.1201.4。
13. 有关巴基奇和海洋-蒂亚索伊图像之间相互关系的讨论,特别关注曼特尼亚的海神之战版画,见 McStay 2014,第 443-59 页。
介绍(英)A delicately proportioned woman rides on the back of a muscular male creature that is human from the waist up with scroll-like front legs and a leafy-finned, serpentine body. The pair are Greco-Roman sea deities. The female is a Nereid, or ocean nymph. The male figure, often identified as a Triton, is more accurately a sea-centaur (ichthyocentaur), a mythological hybrid being with the upper body of a man, equine front legs, and the lower body of a serpent.[1] Frequently represented on classical reliefs, Triton and Nereid figures appear as a lone couple on ancient gems,[2] and on marble sarcophagi as boisterous crowds fighting sea battles or accompanying triumphal sea processions (marine thiasoi).[3] However, Triton and Nereid pairs are not the isolated subjects of classical statuettes. This bronze group is a Renaissance invention made in emulation of the antique while at the same time freely departing from it.

Creating independent statuettes that were inspired by classical and contemporary relief sculptures recalls the compositional approach of the Paduan bronze master Andrea Riccio.[4] The formal similarities between the Triton and Nereid group and Riccio’s other bronze figures have led scholars to credit the conception of this model to the master. However, none of the surviving casts of the Triton and Nereid exhibits the highly distinctive hammering in the metal that is a hallmark of Riccio’s bronzes, and only the example in the Bargello has been tentatively related to Riccio’s shop.[5] The Met Triton and Nereid is much more summarily modeled than its Bargello counterpart; it lacks the decorative pricking on the Triton’s legs and the refined tooling on the figures’ features and hair. An unknown, presumably Paduan sculptor who might have had access to Riccio’s models probably fashioned our bronze after the master’s death.[6]

Twelve versions of the Triton and Nereid statuette are known.[7] The number of surviving bronzes suggests that the motif resonated with audiences in the Veneto, where marine thiasoi were emblematic of Venice’s relationship to the sea.[8] Triumphal sea processions adorn the monumental bronze flagpole bases erected in 1507 in the Piazza San Marco.[9] Cosmological sea-thiasoi reliefs are the foundational scenes at the foot of Riccio’s towering bronze Paschal Candelabrum (p. 00, fig. 13c) in the Basilica of Saint Anthony, Padua.[10] The central civic importance of such public imagery might have encouraged the development of the Triton and Nereid statuette for the private domestic sphere.

The distinctive figure types, poses, and gestures of the Triton and Nereid ultimately derive from a fragmentary sea-triumph sarcophagus in Rome that was well known during the Renaissance.[11] On it, as on most classical sarcophagi, the Nereid passengers are depicted as if in mirror image, one shown from the front, the other from the back. Both views are combined in this engaging statuette, which is composed to feature equally well from either side whether placed high on a shelf or low on a table (the most common domestic locations in which bronzes were displayed). The Triton’s dramatic gestures and turn of the head—presumably toward the viewer—suggests the statuette was designed to be seen principally from the male side, affording a modest view of the Nereid’s graceful back. When placed low on a table, its complementary play between the Nereid, seen from the front, and her much larger male companion is revealed. Her classically idealized sensuality contrasts with the Triton’s monstrous hybrid muscularity. Her graceful, balanced pose and calm introspective expression temper the Triton’s bellicose posturing and belligerent outward gaze.

The Triton looks up sharply to his left and opens his mouth, revealing his teeth. He originally held an object in his raised right hand; the fingers and thumb curl around the rather large insertion hole. The Triton’s gesture is consistent with brandishing a weapon, as seen, for example, in Mantegna’s famous late fifteenth-century engravings of the Battle of the Sea Gods.[12] In his lowered left hand, the Triton holds a syrinx (panpipes), an attribute of the deity Pan, and one common to the followers of the god of wine and ecstatic transport, Bacchus. During the Renaissance, sea triumphs and Bacchic processions symbolized physical, mental, and spiritual transitions, and thus are often represented together.[13] In the Triton and Nereid, the relationship between these subjects is distilled with utmost refinement, granting the small bronze the capacity to be interpreted in a variety of ways depending on the needs and moods of its viewers. In a scholar’s study or collector’s cabinet, for example, the lively bronze figures might have been perceived to embody the inspired Bacchic energy so necessary to creative thinking. On the other hand, contemplation of the Triton and Nereid’s journey might have evoked the classical sea processions on sarcophagi that symbolized the spirit’s transit to eternity.
-DA

Footnotes
(For key to shortened references see bibliography in Allen, Italian Renaissance and Baroque Bronzes in The Metropolitan Museum of Art. NY: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2022)

1. Dimitrios Zikos and Denise Allen in Allen 2008a, p. 104, cat. 2, where it is also noted that the Triton’s abstract, scroll-like forelegs were probably inspired by grotesque decorations in manuscript illuminations. For the relationship between Renaissance hybrid creatures and grotesque decoration, see Hammeken and Hansen 2019.
2. For example, MMA, 06.1205.
3. For marine thiasoi sarcophagi known to the Renaissance, see Bober and Rubinstein 2010, pp. 142–47.
4. See Allen 2008b, pp. 23–24.
5. Bargello, 353 B; see Allen 2008a, pp. 108–9.
6. The alloy is a brass with some lead, tin, arsenic, silver, antimony, iron, and nickel. R. Stone/TR, 2012.
7. See Jestaz 2005, p. 153 n. 122.
8. For the importance of the Triton and Nereid motif in the Veneto, see Luchs 2010.
9. See Wolters 1996.
10. See Banzato 2008b.
11. For this sarcophagus and its numerous reflections in Renaissance art of the Veneto, see Bober and Rubinstein 2010, pp. 144–45, no. 100, figs. 100i–ii, 100a–b.
12. MMA, 18.12 and 1984.1201.4.
13. For a discussion of the interrelationship between Bacchic and marine-thiasoi imagery with a particular focus on Mantegna’s engravings of the Battle of the Sea Gods, see McStay 2014, pp. 443–59.
  大都会艺术博物馆,英文 Metropolitan Museum of Art,是美国最大的艺术博物馆,世界著名博物馆,位于美国纽约第五大道的82号大街。
  大都会博物馆回顾了人类自身的文明史的发展,与中国北京的故宫、英国伦敦的大英博物馆、法国巴黎的卢浮宫、俄罗斯圣彼得堡的艾尔米塔什博物馆并称为世界五大博物馆。