微信公众号 
图码生活

每天发布有五花八门的文章,各种有趣的知识等,期待您的订阅与参与
搜索结果最多仅显示 10 条随机数据
结果缓存两分钟
如需更多更快搜索结果请访问小程序
美国纽约大都会艺术博物馆展品查阅
美国纽约大都会艺术博物馆展品查阅
美国大都会艺术博物馆中的24万件展品,图片展示以及中文和英文双语介绍(中文翻译仅供参考)
读取中
读取中
读取中
品名(中)基督背着十字架
品名(英)Christ bearing the cross
入馆年号1982年,1982.60.109
策展部门欧洲雕塑和装饰艺术European Sculpture and Decorative Arts
创作者Ferdinando Tacca【1619 至 1686】【意大利人】
创作年份公元 1630 - 公元 1665
创作地区
分类雕塑青铜(Sculpture-Bronze)
尺寸整体 (confirmed): 6 3/4 × 9 3/4 × 1 3/4 英寸 (17.1 × 24.8 × 4.4 厘米)
介绍(中)这幅青铜浮雕代表基督在通往各各他(他被钉十字架的地方)的路上在十字架的重压下倒塌,特别是罗马士兵"抓住一个从乡下来的人,昔兰尼的西门,他们把十字架放在他身上,让他背在耶稣后面"(路加福音 23:26)。除了中间的两位主角外,十二个人影排列在拥挤的矩形空间中,包括几个姿势不同的装甲士兵,后方是哭泣的处女,右边是一个戴着头巾的男性人物。该物体旨在用于私人奉献,这可以从其小巧的尺寸和旨在引起同理心和同情心的戏剧性构图中得到暗示。身体向左推,将观众的视线引向中心人物,邀请奉献者认同西蒙协助基督。它们的面部倾斜的角度与横杆的对角线平行。右边的女人停止了前进的动作,她背对着现场,仿佛太痛苦了,无法目睹,我们的眼睛又回到了左边的男人身上,他的目光再次引导我们到基督的苦难上。这样的浮雕非常适合作为珍贵十字架(croce da tavolo)下的predella安装,就像教皇克莱门特八世于1598年捐赠给文森佐一世冈萨加的小祭坛上安装的同一主题的彩绘缩影,现在在曼图亚的教区博物馆。[1]

已知至少有三个其他版本的浮雕,每个版本的大小和形状略有不同:明尼阿波利斯艺术学院,堪萨斯州劳伦斯的斯宾塞艺术博物馆和卢顿胡的沃纳收藏。2] 大都会的牌匾是最好的,而明尼阿波利斯和劳伦斯的牌匾则表现出更粗糙的饰面。该模型最初被暂时归因于纽伦堡雕塑家克里斯托夫·贾姆尼策(Christoph Jamnitzer)的乌尔里希·米德尔多夫(Ulrich Middeldorf)和奥斯瓦尔德·戈茨(Oswald Goetz),然而,他指出,"人物的比例和细节的处理指向熟悉威尼斯艺术的德国人。[3]安东尼·拉德克利夫(Anthony Radcliffe)认为该模型完全是佛罗伦萨的,并将其归因于费迪南多·塔卡(Ferdinando Tacca),詹姆斯·大卫·德雷珀(James David Draper)接受了这一归属,他在1984年出版了我们的青铜。[4]最近的学者将这项发明交给了弗朗切斯科·法内利。[5]细长的人物和异国情调的触感,如头巾,当然可以与法内利和他的工作室的其他产品联系起来,[6]尽管他的风格仍然无法精确定义。[7]在这里,基督的统治人物裹在一件大而飘逸的束腰外衣中,他痛苦的脸从表面伸入观众的空间,可能是受到亚历山德罗·阿尔加迪经常复制的主题的演绎的启发。[8]

支持将我们的牌匾归因于法内利的证据是阿尔卡拉第三公爵(1583-1637)清单中对代表基督背十字架的青铜浮雕的描述,如"热那亚雕塑家"。法内利出生于佛罗伦萨,1609-10年在热那亚有记载。[9]在公爵的库存中,浮雕与相同大小的贤士崇拜配对,其中几个铸件已被确定(最近被解释为基于杜撰福音书的逃往埃及的一集)。[10]1689年热那亚贵族文森佐·斯皮诺拉(Vincenzo Spinola)的清单进一步支持了法内利的作者身份,其中提到"佛罗伦萨的青铜低浮雕[因为法内利的绰号]代表我们的主将十字架带到各各他",安装在装饰有蜡雕像的小木祭坛上。[11]"佛罗伦萨"的浮雕可能是现在青铜器的版本之一。

根据理查德·斯通(Richard Stone)的说法,我们浮雕的背面有许多铸造门的存根,表明它可能是面朝下铸造的。12]铸件质量高,薄且保形。虽然几乎所有意大利文艺复兴时期的青铜器都含有微量的镍,但这里的明显数量表明浮雕不是在意大利制造的。众所周知,法内利活跃在法兰德斯和英格兰。
-FL

脚注
(有关缩短参考文献的关键,请参阅大都会艺术博物馆艾伦、意大利文艺复兴和巴洛克青铜器的参考书目。纽约:大都会艺术博物馆,2022。


1. 见 Venturelli 2012,第 215–17 页,猫。69.
2.第四个完成较少的矩形版本于2005年7月8日在伦敦苏富比拍卖行展出,拍品编号65。
3. 米德尔多夫和格茨 1944 年,第 53 页,第 385 号。
4. 拉德克利夫 1976,第 23 页,第 22 页。
5. 见 Stock 2004,他提到了明尼阿波利斯的版本。其他版本现在也归因于法内利在各自的博物馆网站上。德雷珀在2014年接受了归属(ESDA / OF)。
6. 例如,我想到了圣保罗皈依的弹性姿势,这是法内利在 Seitun 2018 工作室创作的小青铜器,第 85 页。
7. 见库存 2004;桑吉内蒂 2014;塞顿 2018.
8. 关于阿尔加迪的模型,见蒙塔古1985年,第2卷,第322-24页。
9. 参见明尼阿波利斯艺术学院的一对浮雕,66.43.1,.2。博卡多,2003年,第318页;Victoria Avery in V. Avery and Dillon 2002, pp. 172–75.
10. 博卡多,2003年,第319页。
11. R. Stone/TR,2011 年 6 月 20 日。浮雕由铜、锌、锡和铅的四元合金铸造而成。
介绍(英)This bronze relief represents Christ collapsing under the weight of the cross on the road to Golgotha, the place of his crucifixion, and specifically the moment when the Roman soldiers “seized a man, Simon of Cyrene, who was coming from the country, and they laid the cross on him, and made him carry it behind Jesus” (Luke 23:26). Along with the two protagonists at the center, twelve figures are arrayed across the packed rectangular space, including several armored soldiers in different poses, the weeping Virgin in the rear, and a male figure wearing a turban on the right. That the object was intended for private devotion is suggested by its small size and the dramatic composition designed to elicit empathy and compassion. The leftward thrust of the bodies leads the viewer’s eye to the central figures, inviting the devotee to identify with Simon as he assists Christ. Their faces are inclined at the same angle parallel to the diagonal of the crossbar. The forward motion is halted by the woman on the right whose back is turned to the scene as if it were too painful to witness, and our eyes circle back to the man at the left whose gaze again directs us to Christ’s suffering. Such a relief would have been perfectly suited to a mounting as a sort of predella under a precious cross (croce da tavolo), like the painted miniature of the same subject installed in the small altar donated by Pope Clement VIII to Vincenzo I Gonzaga in 1598 and now in the Museo Diocesano, Mantua.[1]

At least three other versions of the relief are known, each of a slightly different size and shape: in the Minneapolis Institute of Art, the Spencer Museum of Art in Lawrence, Kansas, and the Wernher Collection at Luton Hoo.[2] The Met’s plaque is the finest, whereas those in Minneapolis and Lawrence exhibit a rougher finish. The model was first tentatively attributed to the Nuremberg sculptor Christoph Jamnitzer by Ulrich Middeldorf and Oswald Goetz, who noted, however, that “the proportions of the figures and the treatment of the detail point to a German familiar with Venetian art.”[3] Anthony Radcliffe considered the model fully Florentine and ascribed it to Ferdinando Tacca, an attribution accepted by James David Draper, who published our bronze in 1984.[4] Recent scholars have given the invention to Francesco Fanelli.[5] The elongated figures and exoticizing touches such as the turban certainly can be related to other products by Fanelli and his workshop,[6] though his style still eludes precise definition.[7] Here, Christ’s dominating figure, wrapped in a large, flowing tunic, his agonized face projecting from the surface into the viewer’s space, might have been inspired by Alessandro Algardi’s frequently copied rendition of the subject.[8]

Evidence in favor of the attribution of our plaque to Fanelli is the description of a bronze relief representing Christ carrying the cross as by “a sculptor of Genoa” in the inventory of the third duke of Alcalá (1583–1637). Fanelli, born in Florence, is documented in Genoa in 1609–10.[9] In the duke’s inventory, the relief is paired with an Adoration of the Magi of the same size, several casts of which have been identified (and recently interpreted as an episode of the Flight into Egypt based on apocryphal gospels).[10] Further support for Fanelli’s authorship is provided in the 1689 inventory of the Genoan nobleman Vincenzo Spinola, which mentions “a bronze low relief by the Fiorentino [as Fanelli was nicknamed] representing Our Lord carrying the Cross to the Golgotha” that was mounted on a small wood altar decorated with wax figurines.[11] This relief by “the Fiorentino” might be one of the versions of the present bronze.

According to Richard Stone, the reverse of our relief has numerous stubs of casting gates, indicating that it was likely cast face down.[12] The casting is of high quality, thin and quite conformal. While virtually all Italian Renaissance bronzes contain traces of nickel, the conspicuously greater amount here suggests that the relief was not made in Italy. As is well known, Fanelli was active in both Flanders and England.
-FL

Footnotes
(For key to shortened references see bibliography in Allen, Italian Renaissance and Baroque Bronzes in The Metropolitan Museum of Art. NY: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2022.)


1. See Venturelli 2012, pp. 215–17, cat. 69.
2. A fourth, less finished rectangular version was at Sotheby’s, London, July 8, 2005, lot 65.
3. Middeldorf and Goetz 1944, p. 53, no. 385.
4. Radcliffe 1976, p. 23 n. 22.
5. See Stock 2004, who mentions the version in Minneapolis. The other versions too are now attributed to Fanelli on the respective museum websites. Draper accepted the attribution in 2014 (ESDA/OF).
6. I am thinking, for instance, of the elastic pose of the Conversion of Saint Paul, a small bronze attributed to Fanelli’s workshop in Seitun 2018, p. 85.
7. See Stock 2004; Sanguineti 2014; Seitun 2018.
8. On Algardi’s model, see Montagu 1985, vol. 2, pp. 322–24.
9. See the pair of reliefs in the Minneapolis Institute of Art, 66.43.1,.2. Boccardo 2003, p. 318; Victoria Avery in V. Avery and Dillon 2002, pp. 172–75.
10. Boccardo 2003, p. 319.
11. R. Stone/TR, June 20, 2011. The relief was cast in a quaternary alloy of copper, zinc, tin, and lead.
  大都会艺术博物馆,英文 Metropolitan Museum of Art,是美国最大的艺术博物馆,世界著名博物馆,位于美国纽约第五大道的82号大街。
  大都会博物馆回顾了人类自身的文明史的发展,与中国北京的故宫、英国伦敦的大英博物馆、法国巴黎的卢浮宫、俄罗斯圣彼得堡的艾尔米塔什博物馆并称为世界五大博物馆。