微信公众号 
图码生活

每天发布有五花八门的文章,各种有趣的知识等,期待您的订阅与参与
搜索结果最多仅显示 10 条随机数据
结果缓存两分钟
如需更多更快搜索结果请访问小程序
美国纽约大都会艺术博物馆展品查阅
美国纽约大都会艺术博物馆展品查阅
美国大都会艺术博物馆中的24万件展品,图片展示以及中文和英文双语介绍(中文翻译仅供参考)
读取中
读取中
读取中
品名(中)喷泉和水池
品名(英)Fountain and basin
入馆年号1954年,54.147.65a–c
策展部门欧洲雕塑和装饰艺术European Sculpture and Decorative Arts
创作者Meissen Manufactory【1710 至 现在】【德国人】
创作年份公元 1722 - 公元 1737
创作地区
分类陶瓷-瓷器(Ceramics-Porcelain)
尺寸整体 (assembled confirmed): 24 1/2 x 18 1/8 x 16 1/2 英寸 (62.2 x 46 x 41.9 厘米); 其他 (54.147.65 a (fountain)): 13 1/4英寸 (33.7厘米); 其他 (54.147.65 b (plinth)): 11 5/16 x 10英寸 (28.7 x 25.4厘米); 其他 (basin confirmed): 3 1/8 x 18 3/8 x 13 5/8 英寸 (7.9 x 46.7 x 34.6 厘米)
介绍(中)这个桌子喷泉旨在用于洗手,尽管它可能因其装饰价值和功能而创建。喷泉由三部分组成。一个站立的海王星身影将一个贝壳举过肩膀,一只脚搁在海豚的头上,一只海豚的嘴里冒出一个银色的龙头。在海王星下方,有一个单独的底座,上面装饰着两个色狼,他们支撑着一个贝壳状的形状,作为上图的基础。下面有一个大贝壳形式的盆,部分包含在底座的凹陷下部。海王星的形象只是在背面简要完成,而底座的背面完全平坦,表明喷泉和盆打算靠垂直表面放置。海王星持有的外壳中含有香味的水,这些水流过银色水龙头,并被捕获在它下面的盆中。海王星持有的贝壳的大小意味着可用于洗手的水量非常有限,这表明喷泉可能主要被认为是瓷器雕塑的巡回演出。

喷泉是1730年左右在迈森生产的最大,最复杂的作品之一。工厂档案揭示了有关其起源的一定数量的信息,尽管并非所有情况都完全清楚。据记载,德国建模师约翰·戈特利布·基什内尔(Johann Gottlieb Kirchner,生于 1706 年)在 1728 年制作了一个盆地模型,然后在 1732 年制作了第二个模型,当时他还用贝壳和带有色狼的基座(或底座)塑造了一个海王星的形象。[1] 两种盆地模型密切相关,这使得在档案参考中很难区分它们。莫琳·卡西迪-盖格(Maureen Cassidy-Geiger)认为,基什内尔的灵感来自德累斯顿茨温格宫的喷泉[2],雕塑计划已经为他的作品提供了影响的来源(见50.211.229)。

尽管建模和烧制这个由三部分组成的喷泉都涉及技术挑战,但根据部分或完整幸存的例子的数量,似乎可能已经创建了多达十二个喷泉。3]在这十二个中,只有七个是完整的,包括博物馆的例子,[4]而三个组成部分中的一个或多个在其他四个实例中是已知的。[5]似乎在幸存的十个盆中,除了一个之外,其他所有盆地都装饰着约翰·格雷戈里乌斯·霍罗德(Johann Gregorius Höroldt,德国,1696-1775)风格的中国风场景。[6]博物馆的盆地被画成一个中央形状的场景,其中包括一群聚集在桌子周围的中国人物,一个非洲人物出现在棕榈树的树干后面,另一个戴着头饰的中国人物走近这群人。棕榈树和其他色彩缤纷的植被强调了环境的异国情调,远处的海港场景被描绘得非常详细。该场景由一个异常详细的漩涡装饰构成,以金色和紫色光泽进行。漩涡花饰的两侧是两个较小的中国风场景,盆地内缘下方是十二个小的单色中国风和港口场景。主要场景的大小,两个次要小插曲的包含,以及十二个小场景的加入,使这个盆地成为迈森在此期间制作的最精心装饰的作品之一,它反映了餐桌喷泉模型的野心。

中心场景的形象构成可以追溯到舒尔茨手抄本中的两个设计[7],这是为作为迈森画家的设计来源而创作的图纸汇编。[8] 该手抄本于 1723 年至 1724 年组装,不仅包含 Höroldt 的许多草图,还包含许多其他艺术家的许多草图,其中绝大多数描绘了中国风人物和小插图,通常与从组装的草图中绘制的其他图案相结合,在工厂生产的功能和装饰器皿上。手抄本中的草图为在霍罗尔特手下工作的四十六位画家的作品提供了模型,[9]他以这种方式推广的装饰和构图风格定义了迈森在大约 1722 年至 1730 年代初的作品.
卡西迪-盖格观察到迈森这一时期最具雕塑感的几件作品, 完全是巴洛克风格,以Höroldt的方式装饰着中国风绘画。[10]中国风的异想天开、优雅、线性的品质似乎与瓷器模型本身的表现力、雕塑感相得益彰。风格出人意料的融合,或许可以解释为迈森绘画工作室此时独立于建模师工作,没有协调来确保统一的艺术视野。[11]一组桌子喷泉,1727年至1728年左右的维纳斯神庙(见50.211.229),以及1727年至1730年左右的几个钟表盒[12]反映了这种不同风格的融合,模型的雕塑潜力与彩绘装饰之间的这种张力将在接下来的二十年中作为工厂的主题持续存在。


脚注
(有关缩短参考文献的关键,请参阅芒格的参考书目,大都会艺术博物馆的欧洲瓷器。纽约:大都会艺术博物馆,2018)

1 Rückert 1966,第 78 页,第 194 期,彩色第 IV 页,第 164 页,第 851 期,第 202 页。
2 卡西迪-盖格,2002年b,第164页,第12号。
3 尽管尽一切努力编制一份全面的清单,但根据旧的黑白照片和一定数量的所有权变更进行识别使这项任务变得非常具有挑战性,提醒读者不要认为清单是确定的。也就是说,作者非常感谢Maureen Cassidy-Geiger和Clare Le Corbeiller的研究,他们都详尽地对这组物体进行了编目。
4 Hetjens-博物馆,杜塞尔多夫德意志博物馆(Alfred Ziffer in Pietsch and Banz 2010,第296-97页,第302号);路德维希收藏,班贝格(阿利亚诺和耶兹勒-胡布纳,2003年,第34页,图35);前身为阿宾登收藏(佳士得,伦敦,拍卖猫,1949年7月5日,第228号;拍卖在多塞特郡海克利夫海克利夫的海克利夫城堡举行);波尔泽兰萨姆隆,德累斯顿国家艺术学院(E.齐默尔曼,1926年,第13页);原名苏黎世托雷收藏(霍夫曼1980年,第268页,第39号);Mary Moody Northen, Inc.,德克萨斯州加尔维斯顿(佳士得,伦敦,拍卖猫,1980 年 6 月 30 日,第 261 号)。最后一个喷泉的盆地似乎是后来的替代品和不同的模型,十八世纪的起源受到怀疑;参见Clare Le Corbeiller致Bradley C. Brooks,Mary Moody Northen,Inc.策展人,1988年12月7日,策展文件,欧洲雕塑和装饰艺术部,大都会艺术博物馆,纽约。
5 海王星和盆地(但没有底座)在慕尼黑巴伐利亚国家博物馆(吕克尔特,1966年,第78页,第194号,彩色IV,第164页,第851号,第202页); 圣彼得堡冬宫博物馆的海王星雕像(碗被毁)和底座(巴特勒1977年,第3号); 海王星的形象(苏富比, 伦敦,销售目录,1970年5月5日,第162号);Kocher收藏中的一个盆地(Agliano和Jezler-Hübner 2003,第34页,第10期,图36)。
6 莫琳·卡西迪-盖格(Maureen Cassidy-Geiger)在对阿宾登拍卖目录的手写注释中指出,盆地的装饰似乎包括侏儒,尽管销售目录说明(见上文注4)引用了"中国人物"(大都会艺术博物馆欧洲雕塑和装饰艺术部策展文件中的注释影印件)。
7 《异国世界报》,2010年,第78页,第9页,第106页,第37页。
8 Pietsch 2011,第 22–23 页;纳尔逊 2013,第 137 页。
9 Pietsch 2011,第23页。
10 莫琳·卡西迪-盖格,策展档案中的注释,1987年6月,大都会艺术博物馆欧洲雕塑和装饰艺术部。
11 同
上,12 例如,见莱因海克尔,1964年;卡西迪-盖格 2008,第 232–37 页,第 33 期。
介绍(英)This table fountain was intended to be used for the washing of hands, although it may have been created as much for its decorative value as for its functionality. The fountain is composed of three sections. A standing figure of Neptune carries a shell above his shoulders, and one foot rests on the head of a dolphin from whose mouth a silver spigot emerges. Beneath Neptune, there is a separate plinth decorated with two satyrs, who support a shell-like form that serves as the base for the figure above. A basin in the form of a large shell sits below, partially contained within the recessed, lower section of the plinth. The figure of Neptune is only summarily finished on the back, while the back of the plinth is entirely flat, indicating that the fountain and basin were intended to be placed against a vertical surface. The shell held by Neptune would have contained scented water that flowed through the silver spigot and was captured in the basin beneath it. The size of the shell held by Neptune meant that the quantity of water available for hand-washing was quite limited, suggesting that the fountain may have been conceived primarily as a tour de force of porcelain sculpture.

The fountain is one of the largest, most complex works produced at Meissen in the years around 1730. The factory archives reveal a certain amount of information about its genesis, though not all of the circumstances are entirely clear. The German modeler Johann Gottlieb Kirchner (b. 1706) is recorded as having produced a model for a basin in 1728, and then a second model in 1732, at which time he also modeled a figure of Neptune with a shell and a pedestal (or plinth) with satyrs.[1] The two models of basin are closely related, which makes it difficult to distinguish one from the other in the archival references. It has been suggested by Maureen Cassidy-Geiger that Kirchner was inspired by the fountains at the Zwinger Palace in Dresden,[2] where the sculptural program had already provided a source of influence on his work (see 50.211.229).

Despite the technical challenges that would have been involved in both modeling and firing this three- part fountain, it appears there may have been as many as twelve fountains created based on the number of partial or complete surviving examples.[3] Of these twelve, only seven are complete, including the Museum’s example,[4] while one or more of the three components are known in four other instances.[5] It appears that all but one of the surviving ten basins are decorated with chinoiserie scenes in the style of Johann Gregorius Höroldt (German, 1696–1775).[6] The Museum’s basin is painted with a central shaped scene that includes a group of Chinese figures gathered around a table, with an African figure appearing behind the trunk of a palm tree, and another Chinese figure in a headdress approaching the group. The palm trees and the other colorful vegetation emphasize the exotic quality of the setting, and a harbor scene is depicted in minute detail in the far distance. The scene is framed by an unusually detailed cartouche executed in gold and purple luster. At either side of the cartouche are two smaller chinoiserie scenes, and just below the interior rim of the basin are twelve small, monochromatic chinoiserie and harbor scenes. The size of the primary scene, the inclusion of the two secondary vignettes, and the addition of the twelve small scenes make this basin one of the most elaborately decorated works produced at Meissen during this time, and it reflects the ambition of the table fountain model.

The figural composition of the central scene can be traced to two designs in the Schulz Codex,[7] a compilation of drawings created to serve as a design source for the painters at Meissen.[8] Assembled from 1723 to 1724, the codex contains many sketches not only by Höroldt but also by numerous other artists, and the vast majority depict chinoiserie figures and vignettes that could be copied, often in combination with other motifs drawn from the assembled sketches, on both the functional and the decorative wares produced by the factory. The sketches in the codex provided models for the work executed by the forty- six painters working under Höroldt,[9] and the decorative and compositional style that he promoted in this fashion defined Meissen’s production in the years from about 1722 until the early 1730s.
Cassidy-Geiger has observed that several of Meissen’s most sculptural works from this period, which are fully Baroque in style, are decorated with chinoiserie painting in the manner of Höroldt.[10] The whimsical and elegant, linear quality of the chinoiseries seems curiously at odds with the expressive, sculptural aspect of the porcelain models themselves. The unexpected fusion of styles may be explained by the fact that the Meissen painting studio was working independently of the modelers at this time, and there was no coordination to ensure a unified artistic vision.[11] The group of table fountains, the Temple of Venus from around 1727 to 1728 (see 50.211.229), and several clock cases dating from around 1727 to 1730 [12] reflect this fusing of disparate styles, and this tension between the sculptural potential of the model and the painted decoration would persist as a theme at the factory for the next two decades.


Footnotes
(For key to shortened references see bibliography in Munger, European Porcelain in the Metropolitan Museum of Art. NY: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2018)

1 Rückert 1966, p. 78, no.194, color pl. iv, p. 164, no.851, pl. 202.
2 Cassidy-Geiger 2002b, p.164, n. 12.
3 Despite every effort to compile a comprehensive list, identification made on the basis of old black- and- white photographs and a certain number of ownership changes has made this task very challenging, and the reader is cautioned not to regard the list as definitive. That said, the author is very indebted to the research of Maureen Cassidy-Geiger and Clare Le Corbeiller, both of whom worked exhaustively to catalogue this group of objects.
4 Hetjens- Museum, Deutsches Keramikmuseum, Düsseldorf (Alfred Ziffer in Pietsch and Banz 2010, pp. 296–97, no. 302); Ludwig Collection, Bamberg (Agliano and Jezler- Hübner 2003, p. 34, fig. 35); formerly Abingdon Collection (Christie’s, London, sale cat., July 5, 1949, no. 228; sale held at Highcliffe Castle, Highcliffe, Dorset); Porzellansammlung, Staatliche Kunstsammlungen Dresden (E. Zimmermann 1926, pl. 13); formerly Torre Collection, Zurich (Hofmann 1980, p. 268, no. 39); Mary Moody Northen, Inc., Galveston, Texas (Christie’s, London, sale cat., June 30, 1980, no. 261). The basin of this last fountain appears to be a later replacement and of a different model, and an eighteenth-century origin has been doubted; see Clare Le Corbeiller to Bradley C. Brooks, Curator, Mary Moody Northen, Inc., December 7, 1988, curatorial files, Department of European Sculpture and Decorative Arts, The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York.
5 A figure of Neptune and a basin (but without a plinth) are in the Bayerisches Nationalmuseum, Munich (Rückert 1966, p. 78, no. 194, colorpl. iv, p. 164, no. 851, pl. 202); a figure of Neptune (bowl destroyed) and a plinth in the State Hermitage Museum, Saint Petersburg (Butler 1977, no. 3); a figure of Neptune (Sotheby’s, London, sale cat., May 5, 1970, no. 162); a basin in the Kocher Collection (Agliano and Jezler- Hübner 2003, p. 34, no. 10, fig. 36).
6 In a handwritten annotation to the Abingdon sale catalogue, Maureen Cassidy-Geiger observes that the decoration of the basin appears to include dwarfs, even though the sale catalogue description (see note 4 above) cites “Chinese figures” (annotated photocopy in the curatorial files, Department of European Sculpture and Decorative Arts, The Metropolitan Museum of Art).
7 Exotische Welten 2010, p. 78, fol. 9, p. 106, fol. 37.
8 Pietsch 2011, pp. 22–23; Nelson 2013, p. 137.
9 Pietsch 2011, p. 23.
10 Maureen Cassidy-Geiger, note in the curatorial files, June 1987, Department of European Sculpture and Decorative Arts, The Metropolitan Museum of Art.
11 Ibid.
12 See, for example, Reinheckel 1964; Cassidy- Geiger 2008, pp. 232–37, no. 33.
  大都会艺术博物馆,英文 Metropolitan Museum of Art,是美国最大的艺术博物馆,世界著名博物馆,位于美国纽约第五大道的82号大街。
  大都会博物馆回顾了人类自身的文明史的发展,与中国北京的故宫、英国伦敦的大英博物馆、法国巴黎的卢浮宫、俄罗斯圣彼得堡的艾尔米塔什博物馆并称为世界五大博物馆。