微信公众号 
图码生活

每天发布有五花八门的文章,各种有趣的知识等,期待您的订阅与参与
搜索结果最多仅显示 10 条随机数据
结果缓存两分钟
如需更多更快搜索结果请访问小程序
美国纽约大都会艺术博物馆展品查阅
美国纽约大都会艺术博物馆展品查阅
美国大都会艺术博物馆中的24万件展品,图片展示以及中文和英文双语介绍(中文翻译仅供参考)
读取中
读取中
读取中
品名(中)床挂,蓝色抗蚀纺织品
品名(英)Bed hanging, blue-resist textile
入馆年号1954年,54.59.2
策展部门美国之翼The American Wing
创作者
创作年份公元 1725 - 公元 1775
创作地区制造于: 美国(Made in: America)
分类
尺寸Original measurements: 80 x 39 1/4 英寸 (203.2 x 99.7 厘米)
介绍(中)抗蓝色纺织品的特点是在宽松编织的白色棉地面上,采用深蓝色和浅蓝色的自然主义设计。这些设计是将布料浸入靛蓝浴中制作的,而不是试图将靛蓝直接印在布料上。蓝色抗蚀剂织物上的重复图案是首先用蜡覆盖白色地面的区域,蜡有时与其他成分混合,如粘土、淀粉和矿物质,阻止(抵抗)靛蓝染料的渗透。最大的白色区域可能是通过在白色织物上手绘蜡来保留的,白色织物已经轻微地标记了图案,以保持蜡的透明,因此被染成蓝色。图案的标记可以用木制印刷块或模板完成。第一次洗澡会把整个未洗过的图案染成浅蓝色。然后,染工在设计的一些浅蓝色区域上蜡,并在蜡中画出定义某些细节的细线,在当时被称为"铅笔作品"。在用铅笔涂完蜡后,整个作品第二次进入靛蓝浴,这使所有未覆盖的区域变成了更深的蓝色

确定这种蓝色抗蚀织物的原产国令几代美国纺织历史学家感到沮丧。它在美国主要纺织品收藏的博物馆中随处可见,最常见于20世纪20年代至60年代。它作为罕见的早期美国制造的布料进入了这些收藏。这些作品通常伴随着家族历史,这些家族历史证明了纽约哈德逊河谷或长岛,有时是康涅狄格州沿海地区的原始所有权。有趣的是,这些历史中的许多都将这种织物的流行追溯到18世纪从荷兰移民的家庭

然而,经过多年的研究,大多数学者得出结论,由于几乎没有关于18世纪中期美国纺织品生产的文献证据,而且由于现存一件带有英国消费税印花的纺织品,这些纺织品必须在英国制造并出口到美国殖民地。但这一假设仍然存在一个问题,因为在英国没有发现蓝色抗蚀织物。相反,经过最近的研究,这些纺织品很可能是英国东印度公司从印度出口到殖民地的。有几个证据来源可以得出这个结论。至少早在十三世纪,靛蓝抗染在印度就很常见,而全棉白色底布当然是印度的——英国人直到1770年代才完美地织出纯棉。美国商人的订单要求东印度公司的供应商提供这种面料。在生产这些织物的时候,有一项禁令禁止将印度印花织物进口到英国,在那里,它们被认为是与英国印刷品竞争,但该禁令并不适用于北美殖民地。这些装饰性但简单印刷的装饰纺织品可能不会吸引更精致的欧洲市场。然而,作为床帷、被子和窗帘,它们照亮了许多美国殖民者的家园。
介绍(英)Blue-resist textiles are characterized by naturalistic designs in dark and light shades of indigo blue on a loosely woven white cotton ground. These designs were made by dipping the cloth in an indigo bath, rather than trying to print indigo directly onto the cloth. The repeating figures on blue-resist fabric were made by first covering areas of the white ground with wax that was sometimes mixed with other ingredients such as clay, starch and minerals that blocked (resisted) the penetration of the indigo dye. The largest areas of white were probably reserved by painting the wax freehand onto the white fabric, which had been lightly marked with the pattern that was to remain clear of the wax and therefore be dyed blue. The marking of the pattern could have been done with a wooden printing block or with a stencil. The first bath would dye the entire unwaxed pattern a light blue. The dyer then waxed over some of the light blue areas of the design and drew in wax the fine lines that defined certain details, called "pencil work" in the period. After penciling with wax was completed, the entire piece went into the indigo bath a second time, which turned all the still uncovered areas the deeper shade of blue.

Determining the country of origin of this blue-resist fabric frustrated several generations of American textile historians. It is found in abundance in museums with major American textile collections, most often acquired between the 1920s and 1960s. It entered those collections as examples of rare, early American-made fabric. The pieces were often accompanied by family histories that attested to original ownership in New York’s Hudson River valley or Long Island, or sometimes coastal Connecticut. Interestingly, many of these histories trace the popularity of this type of fabric to eighteenth-century families who had emigrated from Netherlands.

However, after years of study most scholars concluded that since there was little documentary evidence of mid-eighteenth-century American textile production, and because there was one extant piece with a British excise tax stamp, these textiles had to have been made in England and exported to the American colonies. But there remained a problem with this supposition, as no blue resist fabric has been found in England. Instead, after recent research, it seems most likely that these textiles were exported by the English East India Company from India to the colonies. Several sources of evidence lead to this conclusion. Resist-dyeing with indigo was common in India at least as early as the thirteenth century, and the all-cotton white base fabric is certainly Indian—the English did not perfect weaving pure cottons until the 1770s. American merchant’s orders exist requesting this type of fabric from their East India Company suppliers. And at the time these fabrics were produced, there was a ban on importing Indian printed fabrics into England where they were perceived as in competition with English printed goods, but that ban did not hold for the North American colonies. It is possible that these decorative, yet simply printed furnishing textiles would not have appealed to the more refined European market. However, as bed hangings, quilts, and curtains, they brightened up the homes of many American colonists.
  大都会艺术博物馆,英文 Metropolitan Museum of Art,是美国最大的艺术博物馆,世界著名博物馆,位于美国纽约第五大道的82号大街。
  大都会博物馆回顾了人类自身的文明史的发展,与中国北京的故宫、英国伦敦的大英博物馆、法国巴黎的卢浮宫、俄罗斯圣彼得堡的艾尔米塔什博物馆并称为世界五大博物馆。